You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Personalized medicine in psychiatry: problems and promises
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Uzoezi Ozomaro, Claes Wahlestedt, Charles B Nemeroff |
| Abstract |
The central theme of personalized medicine is the premise that an individual's unique physiologic characteristics play a significant role in both disease vulnerability and in response to specific therapies. The major goals of personalized medicine are therefore to predict an individual's susceptibility to developing an illness, achieve accurate diagnosis, and optimize the most efficient and favorable response to treatment. The goal of achieving personalized medicine in psychiatry is a laudable one, because its attainment should be associated with a marked reduction in morbidity and mortality. In this review, we summarize an illustrative selection of studies that are laying the foundation towards personalizing medicine in major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. In addition, we present emerging applications that are likely to advance personalized medicine in psychiatry, with an emphasis on novel biomarkers and neuroimaging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| India | 5 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 413 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 15% |
| Researcher | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 11% |
| Other | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 77 | 18% |
| Unknown | 94 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 20% |
| Psychology | 62 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 39 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 58 | 14% |
| Unknown | 109 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#839,829
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#594
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,105
of 207,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#11
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.