You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: Association of regular glucosamine use with incident dementia: evidence from a longitudinal cohort and Mendelian randomization study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-023-02892-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiazhen Zheng, Can Ni, Yingchai Zhang, Jinghan Huang, Daniel Nyarko Hukportie, Buwen Liang, Shaojun Tang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,036,139
of 23,749,054 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,813
of 3,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,800
of 223,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#23
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,749,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.