↓ Skip to main content

COVID-19 mRNA vaccination status and concerns among pregnant women in Japan: a multicenter questionnaire survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COVID-19 mRNA vaccination status and concerns among pregnant women in Japan: a multicenter questionnaire survey
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12884-023-05669-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ken Takahashi, Osamu Samura, Akihiro Hasegawa, Haruna Okubo, Keiji Morimoto, Madoka Horiya, Aikou Okamoto, Daigo Ochiai, Mamoru Tanaka, Masaki Sekiguchi, Naoyuki Miyasaka, Yuto Suzuki, Tsutomu Tabata, Eijiro Hayata, Masahiko Nakata, Tomoo Suzuki, Hirotaka Nishi, Yumi Toda, Shinji Tanigaki, Natsumi Furuya, Junichi Hasegawa, Shunsuke Tamaru, Yoshimasa Kamei, Seisuke Sayama, Takeshi Nagamatsu, Yuka Otera Takahashi, Michihiro Kitagawa, Tatsuya Arakaki, Akihiko Sekizawa

Abstract

mRNA vaccination is an effective, safe, and widespread strategy for protecting pregnant women against infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, information on factors such as perinatal outcomes, safety, and coverage of mRNA vaccinations among pregnant women is limited in Japan. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the perinatal outcomes, coverage, adverse effects, and short-term safety of mRNA vaccination as well as vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women. We conducted a multicenter online survey of postpartum women who delivered their offspring at 15 institutions around Tokyo from October 2021 to March 2022. Postpartum women were divided into vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Perinatal outcomes, COVID-19 prevalence, and disease severity were compared between the two groups. Adverse reactions in the vaccinated group and the reasons for being unvaccinated were also investigated retrospectively. A total of 1,051 eligible postpartum women were included. Of these, 834 (79.4%) had received an mRNA vaccine, while 217 (20.6%) had not, mainly due to concerns about the effect of vaccination on the fetus. Vaccination did not increase the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes, including fetal morphological abnormalities. The vaccinated group demonstrated low COVID-19 morbidity and severity. In the vaccinated group, the preterm birth rate, cesarean section rate, and COVID-19 incidence were 7.2%, 33.2%, and 3.3%, respectively, compared with the 13.7%, 42.2%, and 7.8% in the unvaccinated group, respectively. Almost no serious adverse reactions were associated with vaccination. mRNA vaccines did not demonstrate any adverse effects pertaining to short-term perinatal outcomes and might have prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection or reduced COVID-19 severity. Concerns regarding the safety of the vaccine in relation to the fetus and the mother were the main reasons that prevented pregnant women from being vaccinated. To resolve concerns, it is necessary to conduct further research to confirm not only the short-term safety but also the long-term safety of mRNA vaccines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 15 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 16 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,199,740
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,784
of 4,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,186
of 405,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#50
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.