You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of COVID-19 on electroconvulsive therapy practice across Canadian provinces during the first wave of the pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-023-04832-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilya Demchenko, Vanessa K Tassone, Sarah Dunnett, Arpana Balachandar, Sophie Li, Melanie Anderson, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Karen Foley, Keyvan Karkouti, Sidney H Kennedy, Karim S Ladha, Jamie Robertson, Alon Vaisman, David Koczerginski, Sagar V Parikh, Daniel M Blumberger, Alastair J Flint, Venkat Bhat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 23 | 53% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Librarian | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 23 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,668,504
of 23,764,938 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,891
of 4,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,216
of 225,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#30
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,764,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.