You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Data envelopment analysis to evaluate the efficiency of tobacco treatment programs in the NCI Moonshot Cancer Center Cessation Initiative
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-023-00433-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Pluta, Sarah D. Hohl, Heather D’Angelo, Jamie S. Ostroff, Donna Shelley, Yasmin Asvat, Li-Shiun Chen, K. Michael Cummings, Neely Dahl, Andrew T. Day, Linda Fleisher, Adam O. Goldstein, Rashelle Hayes, Brian Hitsman, Deborah Hudson Buckles, Andrea C. King, Cho Y. Lam, Katie Lenhoff, Arnold H. Levinson, Mara Minion, Cary Presant, Judith J. Prochaska, Kimberly Shoenbill, Vani Simmons, Kathryn Taylor, Hilary Tindle, Elisa Tong, Justin S. White, Kara P. Wiseman, Graham W. Warren, Timothy B. Baker, Betsy Rolland, Michael C. Fiore, Ramzi G. Salloum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,209,053
of 24,877,869 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#315
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,802
of 385,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,877,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.