↓ Skip to main content

To what extent classic socio-economic determinants explain trends of anaemia in tribal and non-tribal women of reproductive age in India? Findings from four National Family Heath Surveys (1998–2021)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To what extent classic socio-economic determinants explain trends of anaemia in tribal and non-tribal women of reproductive age in India? Findings from four National Family Heath Surveys (1998–2021)
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12889-023-15838-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jyoti Ghosal, Madhusmita Bal, Manoranjan Ranjit‬, Arundhuti Das, Manas Ranjan Behera, Sudhir Kumar Satpathy, Ambarish Dutta, Sanghamitra Pati

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 27 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 27 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#23,228,954
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#16,817
of 17,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,785
of 406,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#392
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.