↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between a novel helical and a posterior ankle–foot orthosis on gait in people with unilateral foot drop: a randomised crossover trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison between a novel helical and a posterior ankle–foot orthosis on gait in people with unilateral foot drop: a randomised crossover trial
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12984-023-01184-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Gasq, Raphaël Dumas, Benoit Caussé, Marino Scandella, Pascal Cintas, Blandine Acket, Marie Christine Arné-Bes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Unknown 10 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 10 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,435,643
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#617
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,467
of 402,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.