You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The better the story, the bigger the serving: narrative transportation increases snacking during screen time in a randomized trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-60 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth J Lyons, Deborah F Tate, Dianne S Ward |
Abstract |
Watching television and playing video games increase energy intake, likely due to distraction from satiety cues. A study comparing one hour of watching TV, playing typical video games, or playing motion-controlled video games found a difference across groups in energy intake, but the reasons for this difference are not clear. As a secondary analysis, we investigated several types of distraction to determine potential psychosocial mechanisms which may account for greater energy intake observed during sedentary screen time as compared to motion-controlled video gaming. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 27% |
Netherlands | 6 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 122 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 21 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
Computer Science | 8 | 6% |
Other | 30 | 23% |
Unknown | 29 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,207,594
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#406
of 2,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,361
of 208,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#6
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.