↓ Skip to main content

The better the story, the bigger the serving: narrative transportation increases snacking during screen time in a randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The better the story, the bigger the serving: narrative transportation increases snacking during screen time in a randomized trial
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-60
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth J Lyons, Deborah F Tate, Dianne S Ward

Abstract

Watching television and playing video games increase energy intake, likely due to distraction from satiety cues. A study comparing one hour of watching TV, playing typical video games, or playing motion-controlled video games found a difference across groups in energy intake, but the reasons for this difference are not clear. As a secondary analysis, we investigated several types of distraction to determine potential psychosocial mechanisms which may account for greater energy intake observed during sedentary screen time as compared to motion-controlled video gaming.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 122 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Computer Science 8 6%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 29 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,207,594
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#406
of 2,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,361
of 208,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#6
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.