You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Application of a nanotechnology antimicrobial spray to prevent lower urinary tract infection: a multicenter urology trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-10-s1-s14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei He, Dongmin Wang, Zhangqun Ye, Weihong Qian, Yan Tao, Xiaofeng Shi, Ling Liu, Jin Chen, Ling Qiu, Peng Wan, Xiaojun Jia, Xia Li, Caixia Gao, Xuexia Ma, Biyan Wen, Nianzhen Chen, Ping Li, Zhengzheng Ren, Li Lan, Siyi Li, Yi Zuo, Hua Zhang, Liming Ma, Yueping Zhang, Zhicong Li, Weiping Su, Qing Yang, Qingli Chen, Xuejing Wang, Zhenni Ye, JP Chen, Wings TY Loo, Louis WC Chow, Adrian YS Yip, Elizabeth LY Ng, Mary NB Cheung, Zhiping Wang |
| Abstract |
Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is a common nosocomial device-associated infection. It is now recognized that the high infection rates were caused by the formation of biofilm on the surface of the catheters that decreases the susceptibility to antibiotics and results in anti-microbial resistance.In this study, we performed an in vitro test to explore the mechanism of biofilm formation and subsequently conducted a multi-center clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of CAUTI prevention with the application of JUC, a nanotechnology antimicrobial spray. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,193,180
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,301
of 3,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,808
of 170,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#51
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.