You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
TRIPLE C reporting principles for case study evaluations of the role of context in complex interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-023-01888-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara E. Shaw, Sara Paparini, Jamie Murdoch, Judith Green, Trisha Greenhalgh, Benjamin Hanckel, Hannah M. James, Mark Petticrew, Gary W. Wood, Chrysanthi Papoutsi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 47% |
| Australia | 3 | 16% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,930,739
of 25,145,981 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#443
of 2,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,232
of 382,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,145,981 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.