↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells in suspension

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells in suspension
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/scrt131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kentaro Akiyama, Yong-Ouk You, Takayoshi Yamaza, Chider Chen, Liang Tang, Yan Jin, Xiao-Dong Chen, Stan Gronthos, Songtao Shi

Abstract

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) are a heterogeneous population of postnatal precursor cells with the capacity of adhering to culture dishes generating colony-forming unit-fibroblasts (CFU-F). Here we identify a new subset of BMMSCs that fail to adhere to plastic culture dishes and remain in culture suspension (S-BMMSCs). METHODS: To catch S-BMMSCs, we used BMMSCs-produced extracellular cell matrix (ECM)-coated dishes. Isolated S-BMMSCs were analyzed by in vitro stem cell analysis approaches, including flow cytometry, inductive multiple differentiation, western blot and in vivo implantation to assess the bone regeneration ability of S-BMMSCs. Furthermore, we performed systemic S-BMMSCs transplantation to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-like MRL/lpr mice. RESULTS: S-BMMSCs are capable of adhering to ECM-coated dishes and showing mesenchymal stem cell characteristics with distinction from hematopoietic cells as evidenced by co-expression of CD73 or Oct-4 with CD34, forming a single colony cluster on ECM, and failure to differentiate into hematopoietic cell lineage. Moreover, we found that culture-expanded S-BMMSCs exhibited significantly increased immunomodulatory capacities in vitro and an efficacious treatment for SLE-like MRL/lpr mice by rebalancing regulatory T cells (Tregs) and T helper 17 cells (Th17) through high NO production. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that it is feasible to improve immunotherapy by identifying a new subset BMMSCs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,527,776
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#302
of 2,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,005
of 176,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.