You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primary SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: long-term humoral immune responses and effects on disease activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-023-08298-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koos P. J. van Dam, Adriaan G. Volkers, Luuk Wieske, Eileen W. Stalman, Laura Y. L. Kummer, Zoé L. E. van Kempen, Joep Killestein, Sander W. Tas, Laura Boekel, Gerrit J. Wolbink, Anneke J. van der Kooi, Joost Raaphorst, R. Bart Takkenberg, Geert R. A. M. D’Haens, Phyllis I. Spuls, Marcel W. Bekkenk, Annelie H. Musters, Nicoline F. Post, Angela L. Bosma, Marc L. Hilhorst, Yosta Vegting, Frederike J. Bemelman, Alexandre E. Voskuyl, Bo Broens, Agner Parra Sanchez, Cécile A. C. M. van Els, Jelle de Wit, Abraham Rutgers, Karina de Leeuw, Barbara Horváth, Jan J. G. M. Verschuuren, Annabel M. Ruiter, Lotte van Ouwerkerk, Diane van der Woude, Renée C. F. Allaart, Y. K. Onno Teng, Pieter van Paassen, Matthias H. Busch, Papay B. P. Jallah, Esther Brusse, Pieter A. van Doorn, Adája E. Baars, Dirk Jan Hijnen, Corine R. G. Schreurs, W. Ludo van der Pol, H. Stephan Goedee, Maurice Steenhuis, Sofie Keijzer, Jim B. D. Keijser, Olvi Cristianawati, Anja ten Brinke, Niels J. M. Verstegen, S. Marieke van Ham, Theo Rispens, Taco W. Kuijpers, Mark Löwenberg, Filip Eftimov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| Mexico | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,366,754
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#688
of 8,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,263
of 394,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#11
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.