You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Digital encounter decision aids linked to clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing SHARE-IT decision aids in primary care
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-023-02186-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pieter Van Bostraeten, Bert Aertgeerts, Geertruida Bekkering, Nicolas Delvaux, Anna Haers, Matisse Vanheeswyck, Alexander Vandekendelaere, Niels Van der Auwera, Charlotte Dijckmans, Elise Ostyn, Willem Soontjens, Wout Matthysen, Noémie Schenk, Lien Mertens, Jasmien Jaeken, Thomas Agoritsas, Mieke Vermandere |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 17% |
Japan | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Librarian | 1 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#13,708,111
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#897
of 2,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,874
of 363,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.