↓ Skip to main content

Influenza infection and risk of acute pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Journal, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 410)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influenza infection and risk of acute pulmonary embolism
Published in
Thrombosis Journal, October 2007
DOI 10.1186/1477-9560-5-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthijs van Wissen, Tymen T Keller, Brechje Ronkes, Victor EA Gerdes, Hans L Zaaijer, Eric CM van Gorp, Dees PM Brandjes, Marcel Levi, Harry R Büller

Abstract

Influenza infections have been associated with procoagulant changes. Whether influenza infections lead to an increased risk of pulmonary embolism remains to be established. We conducted a nested case control study in a large cohort of patients with a clinical suspicion of having pulmonary embolism. Blood samples were collected to investigate the presence of influenza A and B by complement fixation assay (CFA). We compared case patients, in whom pulmonary embolism was proven (n = 102), to controls, in whom pulmonary embolism was excluded (n = 395). Furthermore, we compared symptoms of influenza-like illness in both patient groups 2 weeks prior to inclusion in the study, using the influenza-like illness (ILI) score, which is based on a questionnaire. We calculated the risk of pulmonary embolism associated with influenza infection. The percentage of patients with influenza A was higher in the control group compared to the case group (4.3% versus 1.0%, respectively, odds ratio 0.22; 95% CI: 0.03-1.72). Influenza B was not detectable in any of the cases and was found in 3 of the 395 controls (0.8%). The ILI score was positive in 24% of the cases and 25% in the control persons (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI: 0.67-2.01). We did not observe an association between the ILI score and proven influenza infection. In this clinical study, influenza infection was not associated with an increased risk of acute pulmonary embolism. The ILI score is non-specific in this clinical setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Argentina 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 67%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,191,564
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#24
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,850
of 84,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.