You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13030-023-00277-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nobuhiro Nohara, Yukari Yamanaka, Mikiko Matsuoka, Tadahiro Yamazaki, Keisuke Kawai, Shu Takakura, Nobuyuki Sudo, Tetsuya Ando, Yutaka Matsuyama, Susan Byrne, Riccardo Dalle Grave, Zafra Cooper, Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 2 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,943,075
of 24,875,365 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#147
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,781
of 371,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,875,365 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.