You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lessons learned obtaining informed consent in research with vulnerable populations in community health center settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-5-624 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather E Riden, Kya N Grooms, Cheryl R Clark, Laura R Cohen, Josh Gagne, Dora A Tovar, Mark J Ommerborn, Piper S Orton, Paula A Johnson |
| Abstract |
To improve equity in access to medical research, successful strategies are needed to recruit diverse populations. Here, we examine experiences of community health center (CHC) staff who guided an informed consent process to overcome recruitment barriers in a medical record review study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2013.
All research outputs
#13,036,992
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,588
of 4,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,208
of 183,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#34
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.