You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Generic drug crisis in Japan and changes leading to the collapse of universal health insurance established in 1961: the case of Kobayashi Kako Co. Ltd.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-023-00441-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Makoto Kosaka, Akihiko Ozaki, Yudai Kaneda, Hiroaki Saito, Erika Yamashita, Anju Murayama, Hanano Mamada, Tetsuya Tanimoto, Mihajlo Jakovljevic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 26 | 38% |
| Unknown | 43 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 99% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2023.
All research outputs
#965,620
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#14
of 558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,698
of 394,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.