You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison between machine learning methods for mortality prediction for sepsis patients with different social determinants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-022-01871-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanyin Wang, Yikuan Li, Andrew Naidech, Yuan Luo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,606,638
of 23,920,246 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#185
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,985
of 417,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#5
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,920,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.