↓ Skip to main content

Social determinants of health and periodontal disease in Brazilian adults: a cross- sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social determinants of health and periodontal disease in Brazilian adults: a cross- sectional study
Published in
BMC Oral Health, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6831-13-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria de Lourdes Carvalho Bonfim, Flavio Freitas Mattos, Efigênia Ferreira e Ferreira, Ana Cristina Viana Campos, Andréa Maria Duarte Vargas

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, increasing importance has been placed on the social determinants of health and disease. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of periodontal disease in Brazilian adults and identify possible relationships with social determinants. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed using a sample of 743 adults (aged 35--49 years) living in an urban area of a large city in southeastern Brazil. The condition of the periodontium was assessed using the Community Periodontal Index (CPI) according to the diagnostic criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO). The variables related to social determinants were collected using a structured questionnaire. A descriptive analysis of all study variables was performed. Multiple correspondence analysis was subsequently performed to identify relationships between periodontal disease and the social determinants of health. RESULTS: The periodontal exams showed that 36.5% of adults had a healthy periodontium, 2.0% had gingival bleeding, 47.1% had calculus and 9.5% had periodontal pockets of 4--5 mm. Periodontal pockets of 6 mm or more were the worst periodontal condition found (affecting only 2.1% of the participants). The correspondence analysis enabled us to form three groups with different profiles. The first group was distinguished by the presence of bleeding (gingivitis) or a healthy periodontium. The members of this group were typically aged 35 to 39 years and had 9--12 years or more than 12 years of education. The second group consisted of subjects with calculus and periodontal pockets of 4--5 mm. The members of this group were typically white men aged 40--44 years with incomes greater than $ 300.00. The third group was distinguished by the presence of periodontal pockets of 6 mm or more. The members of this group were typically adult females, black and mixed individuals who had 8 years or less of schooling, individuals with incomes <= $ 300.00 and widowers. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that periodontal health is worse in the group for which the social indicators are worse. Therefore, the social determinants of health also affect the severity of periodontal disease in adults Brazilian society.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Unspecified 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,611
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#733
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,857
of 195,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.