You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-249 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cara L Booker, Seeromanie Harding, Michaela Benzeval |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 254 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 11% |
| Psychology | 28 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 68 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,393,063
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,398
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,105
of 125,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#54
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.