↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based WHO cardiovascular disease risk charts: a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based WHO cardiovascular disease risk charts: a population-based study
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12967-022-03336-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatemeh Rezaei, Mozhgan Seif, Abdullah Gandomkar, Mohammad Reza Fattahi, Fatemeh Malekzadeh, Sadaf G. Sepanlou, Jafar Hasanzadeh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Researcher 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 12 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,886,606
of 23,914,787 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,334
of 4,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,380
of 446,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#23
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,914,787 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.