↓ Skip to main content

Immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a randomized, controlled trial in adults

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a randomized, controlled trial in adults
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiří Beran, Mathieu Peeters, Walthère Dewé, Jolana Raupachová, Lenka Hobzová, Jeanne-Marie Devaster

Abstract

Two phylogenetic lineages of influenza B virus coexist and circulate in the human population (B/Yamagata and B/Victoria) but only one B-strain is included in each seasonal vaccine. Mismatch regularly occurs between the recommended and circulating B-strain. Inclusion of both lineages in vaccines may offer better protection against influenza.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,343,433
of 9,464,402 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#955
of 4,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,054
of 127,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#40
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,464,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.