You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PLANEX: the plant co-expression database
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-13-83 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Won Cheol Yim, Yongbin Yu, Kitae Song, Cheol Seong Jang, Byung-Moo Lee |
| Abstract |
The PLAnt co-EXpression database (PLANEX) is a new internet-based database for plant gene analysis. PLANEX (http://planex.plantbioinformatics.org) contains publicly available GeneChip data obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). PLANEX is a genome-wide co-expression database, which allows for the functional identification of genes from a wide variety of experimental designs. It can be used for the characterization of genes for functional identification and analysis of a gene's dependency among other genes. Gene co-expression databases have been developed for other species, but gene co-expression information for plants is currently limited. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 83 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 32% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,695,536
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#511
of 3,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,049
of 197,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,322 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.