↓ Skip to main content

The effect of customised and sham foot orthoses on plantar pressures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of customised and sham foot orthoses on plantar pressures
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-6-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris J McCormick, Daniel R Bonanno, Karl B Landorf

Abstract

The effectiveness of foot orthoses has been evaluated in many clinical trials with sham foot orthoses used as the control intervention in at least 10 clinical trials. However, the mechanical effects and credibility of sham orthoses has been rarely quantified. This study aimed to: (i) compare the effects on plantar pressures of three sham foot orthoses to a customised foot orthosis, and (ii) establish the perceived credibility and the expected benefit of each orthotic condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 23%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Engineering 18 14%
Sports and Recreations 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 33 25%