You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance artefacts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro F Ferreira, Peter D Gatehouse, Raad H Mohiaddin, David N Firmin |
| Abstract |
The multitude of applications offered by CMR make it an increasing popular modality to study the heart and the surrounding vessels. Nevertheless the anatomical complexity of the chest, together with cardiac and respiratory motion, and the fast flowing blood, present many challenges which can possibly translate into imaging artefacts. The literature is wide in terms of papers describing specific MR artefacts in great technical detail. In this review we attempt to summarise, in a language accessible to a clinical readership, some of the most common artefacts found in CMR applications. It begins with an introduction of the most common pulse sequences, and imaging techniques, followed by a brief section on typical cardiovascular applications. This leads to the main section on common CMR artefacts with examples, a short description of the mechanisms behind them, and possible solutions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 286 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 20% |
| Researcher | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 20% |
| Unknown | 49 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 34% |
| Engineering | 69 | 23% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 18 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 60 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,048,999
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#498
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,151
of 209,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.