You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A glimpse on the pattern of rodent diversification: a phylogenetic approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-12-88 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre-Henri Fabre, Lionel Hautier, Dimitar Dimitrov, Emmanuel J P Douzery |
| Abstract |
Development of phylogenetic methods that do not rely on fossils for the study of evolutionary processes through time have revolutionized the field of evolutionary biology and resulted in an unprecedented expansion of our knowledge about the tree of life. These methods have helped to shed light on the macroevolution of many taxonomic groups such as the placentals (Mammalia). However, despite the increase of studies addressing the diversification patterns of organisms, no synthesis has addressed the case of the most diversified mammalian clade: the Rodentia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Israel | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 400 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 20% |
| Researcher | 76 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 9% |
| Other | 70 | 17% |
| Unknown | 69 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 235 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 30 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 4% |
| Unknown | 77 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,707,689
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#399
of 3,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,774
of 184,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.