You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Salicylic acid-induced differential resistance to the Tomato yellow leaf curl virus among resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12870-019-1784-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tong Li, Ying Huang, Zhi-Sheng Xu, Feng Wang, Ai-Sheng Xiong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 17% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,247,940
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#170
of 3,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,394
of 353,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#6
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.