↓ Skip to main content

Increased replication of CD4+ naive T cells and changes in T cell homeostasis in a case of acute exacerbation of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case comparison study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased replication of CD4+ naive T cells and changes in T cell homeostasis in a case of acute exacerbation of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case comparison study
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1752-1947-7-135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Almanzar, Manuela Zlamy, Christian Koppelstaetter, Andrea Brunner, Verena Jeller, Christina Duftner, Christian Dejaco, Juergen Brunner, Martina Prelog

Abstract

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a heterogeneous T cell-mediated autoimmune disease with symptoms of premature aging of the immune system (immunosenescence). The present work is an investigation of immunosenescence parameters, such as quantity of naive and CD28- T cells, T cell receptor excision circles, relative telomere length and alterations of peripheral T cell replication, and was performed via comparison of a case of acute exacerbation of juvenile idiopathic arthritis against six patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis with disease remission and six age-matched healthy donors over a follow-up course of 12 months.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,640,742
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#386
of 3,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,301
of 195,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,891 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.