↓ Skip to main content

The clinical utility of rapid exome sequencing in a consanguineous population

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The clinical utility of rapid exome sequencing in a consanguineous population
Published in
Genome Medicine, June 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13073-023-01192-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorota Monies, Ewa Goljan, Mirna Assoum, Muna Albreacan, Faisal Binhumaid, Shazia Subhani, Abdulmlik Boureggah, Mais Hashem, Firdous Abdulwahab, Omar Abuyousef, Mohamad H. Temsah, Fahad Alsohime, James Kelaher, Mohamed Abouelhoda, Brian F. Meyer, Fowzan S. Alkuraya

Abstract

The clinical utility of exome sequencing is now well documented. Rapid exome sequencing (RES) is more resource-intensive than regular exome sequencing and is typically employed in specialized clinical settings wherein urgent molecular diagnosis is thought to influence acute management. Studies on the clinical utility of RES have been largely limited to outbred populations. Here, we describe our experience with rapid exome sequencing (RES) in a highly consanguineous population. Clinical settings included intensive care units, prenatal cases approaching the legal cutoff for termination, and urgent transplant decisions. A positive molecular finding (a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant that explains the phenotype) was observed in 80 of 189 cases (42%), while 15 (8%) and 94 (50%) received ambiguous (variant of uncertain significance (VUS)) and negative results, respectively. The consanguineous nature of the study population gave us an opportunity to observe highly unusual and severe phenotypic expressions of previously reported genes. Clinical utility was observed in nearly all (79/80) cases with positive molecular findings and included management decisions, prognostication, and reproductive counseling. Reproductive counseling is a particularly important utility in this population where the overwhelming majority (86%) of identified variants are autosomal recessive, which are more actionable in this regard than the de novo variants typically reported by RES elsewhere. Indeed, our cost-effectiveness analysis shows compelling cost savings in the study population. This work expands the diversity of environments in which RES has a demonstrable clinical utility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Other 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,435,046
of 24,837,702 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#309
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,733
of 359,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,702 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.