↓ Skip to main content

COHELLP: collaborative randomized controlled trial on corticosteroids in HELLP syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COHELLP: collaborative randomized controlled trial on corticosteroids in HELLP syndrome
Published in
Reproductive Health, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-4755-10-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leila Katz, Melania Amorim, João P Souza, Samira M Haddad, José G Cecatti, COHELLP Study Group

Abstract

Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome is one of the most severe forms of preeclampsia and aggravates both maternal and perinatal prognosis. The systematic review available in Cochrane Library compared corticosteroid (dexamethasone, betamethasone, or prednisolone) given during pregnancy, just after delivery or in the postnatal period, or both before and after birth, with placebo or no treatment. Those receiving steroids showed significantly greater improvement in platelet counts which was greater for those receiving dexamethasone than those receiving betamethasone. There was no clear evidence of any effect of corticosteroids on substantive clinical outcomes. These benefits appear to be greater in Class I HELLP syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
Nigeria 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 85 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,794,657
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#775
of 1,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,589
of 197,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.