↓ Skip to main content

How to avoid harm with feeding critically ill patients: a synthesis of viewpoints of a basic scientist, dietitian and intensivist

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
179 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to avoid harm with feeding critically ill patients: a synthesis of viewpoints of a basic scientist, dietitian and intensivist
Published in
Critical Care, July 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13054-023-04543-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annika Reintam Blaser, Olav Rooyackers, Danielle E. Bear

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 179 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 19%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Unspecified 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 48%
Unspecified 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#375,902
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#198
of 6,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,846
of 375,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.