↓ Skip to main content

A new synaptic player leading to autism risk: Met receptor tyrosine kinase

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new synaptic player leading to autism risk: Met receptor tyrosine kinase
Published in
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11689-011-9081-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew C. Judson, Kathie L. Eagleson, Pat Levitt

Abstract

The validity for assigning disorder risk to an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) candidate gene comes from convergent genetic, clinical, and developmental neurobiology data. Here, we review these lines of evidence from multiple human genetic studies, and non-human primate and mouse experiments that support the conclusion that the MET receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) functions to influence synapse development in circuits relevant to certain core behavioral domains of ASD. There is association of both common functional alleles and rare copy number variants that impact levels of MET expression in the human cortex. The timing of Met expression is linked to axon terminal outgrowth and synaptogenesis in the developing rodent and primate forebrain, and both in vitro and in vivo studies implicate this RTK in dendritic branching, spine maturation, and excitatory connectivity in the neocortex. This impact can occur in a cell-nonautonomous fashion, emphasizing the unique role that Met plays in specific circuits relevant to ASD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 122 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Researcher 27 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Professor 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 16%
Neuroscience 16 12%
Psychology 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,748,343
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#61
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,542
of 109,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them