You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Myocardial infarction on the ICU: can we do better?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, April 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc6832 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ian Webb, James Coutts |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Greece | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 33% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 71% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,042
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,930
of 95,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#13
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.