You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mutations within lncRNAs are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wilfried Haerty, Chris P Ponting |
| Abstract |
Previous studies in Drosophila and mammals have revealed levels of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) sequence conservation that are intermediate between neutrally evolving and protein-coding sequence. These analyses compared conservation between species that diverged up to 75 million years ago. However, analysis of sequence polymorphisms within a species' population can provide an understanding of essentially contemporaneous selective constraints that are acting on lncRNAs and can quantify the deleterious effect of mutations occurring within these loci. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 23% |
| Germany | 2 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 59% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 98 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,284,291
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#990
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,339
of 207,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#15
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.