↓ Skip to main content

Update: Rationale and design of the Sodium Lowering In Dialysate (SoLID) trial: a randomised controlled trial of low versus standard dialysate sodium concentration during hemodialysis for regression…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Update: Rationale and design of the Sodium Lowering In Dialysate (SoLID) trial: a randomised controlled trial of low versus standard dialysate sodium concentration during hemodialysis for regression of left ventricular mass
Published in
BMC Nephrology, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12882-015-0080-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna Leigh Dunlop, Alain Charles Vandal, Janak Rashme de Zoysa, Ruvin Sampath Gabriel, Imad Adbi Haloob, Christopher John Hood, Philip James Matheson, David Owen Ross McGregor, Kannaiyan Samuel Rabindranath, David John Semple, Mark Roger Marshall

Abstract

After the publication of our paper Dunlop et al. "Rationale and design of the Sodium Lowering In Dialysate (SoLID) trial: a randomised controlled trial of low versus standard dialysate sodium concentration during hemodialysis for regression of left ventricular mass", we became aware of further data correlating left ventricular (LV) mass index at baseline and their correpsonding mass at 12 months, using cardiac margnetic resonanace imaging (MRI) in patients on hemodialysis. The original published sample size for the SoLID trial of 118 was a conservative estimate, calculated using analysis of covariance and a within person Pearson's correlation for LV mass index of 0.75. New data communicated to the SoLID trial group has resulted in re-calcuation of the sample size, based upon a within person Pearson's correlation of 0.8 but otherwise unchanged assumptions. As a result, the SoLID trial will now recruit 96 participants.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Unspecified 1 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Decision Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%