↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of participation in a longitudinal two-stage study of the health consequences of the Chornobyl nuclear power plant accident

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of participation in a longitudinal two-stage study of the health consequences of the Chornobyl nuclear power plant accident
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-8-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin T Guey, Evelyn J Bromet, Semyon F Gluzman, Victoria Zakhozha, Vlodomyr Paniotto

Abstract

The determinants of participation in long-term follow-up studies of disasters have rarely been delineated. Even less is known from studies of events that occurred in eastern Europe. We examined the factors associated with participation in a longitudinal two-stage study conducted in Kyiv following the 1986 Chornobyl nuclear power plant accident.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Vietnam 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Social Sciences 9 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,392,410
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#965
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,322
of 78,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.