Title |
The choice between a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor- and a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen for initiation of antiretroviral treatment – results from an observational study in Germany
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40545-016-0092-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jörg Mahlich, Mona Groß, Alexander Kuhlmann, Johannes Bogner, Hans Heiken, Matthias Stoll |
Abstract |
This study aims at identifying predictors of the treatment decision of German physicians with regard to a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) -based initial treatment regimen. The study is based on a sub analysis of a nation-wide multi-centre, non-interventional, prospective cohort study. 133 patients were identified, who received antiretroviral first-line therapy. By means of a logistic regression, factors that determine the treatment strategy for treatment-naïve patients were analysed. Compared to patients receiving a NNRTI-based initial regimen, patients treated with PI/r are slightly younger, less educated, in a later stage of HIV and have more concomitant diseases. Regression analysis revealed that being in a later stage of HIV (CDC-C) is significantly associated with a PI/r-based treatment decision. Our analysis is the first study in Germany investigating sociodemographic and disease-specific parameters associated with a NNRTI- or a PI/r-based initial treatment decision. The results confirm that the treatment decision for a PI/r strategy is associated with disease severity. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 33% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |