You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lentivirus-mediated transgene delivery to the hippocampus reveals sub-field specific differences in expression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-10-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lenneke WA van Hooijdonk, Muhammad Ichwan, Thomas F Dijkmans, Theo G Schouten, Marijke WA de Backer, Roger AH Adan, Fons J Verbeek, Erno Vreugdenhil, Carlos P Fitzsimons |
| Abstract |
In the adult hippocampus, the granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus is a heterogeneous structure formed by neurons of different ages, morphologies and electrophysiological properties. Retroviral vectors have been extensively used to transduce cells of the granule cell layer and study their inherent properties in an intact brain environment. In addition, lentivirus-based vectors have been used to deliver transgenes to replicative and non-replicative cells as well, such as post mitotic neurons of the CNS. However, only few studies have been dedicated to address the applicability of these widespread used vectors to hippocampal cells in vivo. Therefore, the aim of this study was to extensively characterize the cell types that are effectively transduced in vivo by VSVg-pseudotyped lentivirus-based vectors in the hippocampus dentate gyrus. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 125 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 29% |
| Researcher | 31 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 50% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,194,150
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#1,052
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,049
of 169,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.