You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differences in preferences for rural job postings between nursing students and practicing nurses: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Lao People’s Democratic Republic
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter C Rockers, Wanda Jaskiewicz, Margaret E Kruk, Outavong Phathammavong, Phouthone Vangkonevilay, Chanthakhath Paphassarang, Inpong Thong Phachanh, Laura Wurts, Kate Tulenko |
Abstract |
A discrete choice experiment was conducted to investigate preferences for job characteristics among nursing students and practicing nurses to determine how these groups vary in their respective preferences and to understand whether differing policies may be appropriate for each group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 24 | 21% |
Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Researcher | 6 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 18% |
Unknown | 27 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 21% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Unknown | 29 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#730
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,486
of 207,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.