↓ Skip to main content

The effect of Self-Help Groups on access to maternal health services: evidence from rural India

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of Self-Help Groups on access to maternal health services: evidence from rural India
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-12-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Somen Saha, Peter Leslie Annear, Swati Pathak

Abstract

The main challenge for achieving universal health coverage in India is ensuring effective coverage of poor and vulnerable communities in the face of high levels of income and gender inequity in access to health care. Drawing on the social capital generated through women's participation in community organizations like SHGs can influence health outcomes. To date, evidence about the impact of SHGs on health outcomes has been derived from pilot-level interventions, some using randomised controlled trials and other rigorous methods. While the evidence from these studies is convincing, our study is the first to analyse the impact of SHGs at national level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 262 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 17%
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 15 6%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 69 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 20%
Social Sciences 44 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 80 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,240,498
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#962
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,590
of 207,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.