↓ Skip to main content

Unintended consequences of communicating rapid COVID-19 vaccine policy changes– a qualitative study of health policy communication in Ontario, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unintended consequences of communicating rapid COVID-19 vaccine policy changes– a qualitative study of health policy communication in Ontario, Canada
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12889-023-15861-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Vernon-Wilson, Moses Tetui, Agnes Nanyonjo, Maisha Adil, Arthi Bala, David Nelson, Emma Sayers, Nancy Waite, Kelly Grindrod

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 17%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Social Sciences 3 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,387,208
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,515
of 17,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,980
of 391,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#194
of 428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.