↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac reverse remodeling in primary mitral regurgitation: mitral valve replacement vs. mitral valve repair

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiac reverse remodeling in primary mitral regurgitation: mitral valve replacement vs. mitral valve repair
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12968-023-00946-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas P. Craven, Pei G. Chew, Laura E. Dobson, Miroslawa Gorecka, Martine Parent, Louise A. E. Brown, Christopher E. D. Saunderson, Arka Das, Amrit Chowdhary, Nicholas Jex, David M. Higgins, Erica Dall’Armellina, Eylem Levelt, Dominik Schlosshan, Peter P. Swoboda, Sven Plein, John P. Greenwood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 67%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,944,096
of 25,990,981 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#600
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,414
of 366,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.