You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simple allele-discriminating PCR for cost-effective and rapid genotyping and mapping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-5-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Minh Bui, Zhongchi Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belarus | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#478
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,292
of 187,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them