You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chinese herbal compound prescriptions combined with Chinese medicine powder based on traditional Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation for treatment of chronic atrophic gastritis with erosion: a multi-center, randomized, positive-controlled clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chinese Medicine, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13020-022-00692-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tai Zhang, Beihua Zhang, Jinkang Xu, Shunping Ren, Shaogang Huang, Zhaohong Shi, Shaoju Guo, Liqun Bian, Ping Wang, Fengyun Wang, Yidong Cai, Xudong Tang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,840,893
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#89
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,904
of 478,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.