You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Liquid-phase hydrogenation of bio-refined succinic acid to 1,4-butanediol using bimetallic catalysts
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Chemical Engineering, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s42480-019-0010-z |
Authors |
Pabitra Kumar Baidya, Ujjaini Sarkar, Raffaela Villa, Suvra Sadhukhan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 27% |
Researcher | 8 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 18 | 29% |
Chemistry | 9 | 15% |
Engineering | 4 | 6% |
Materials Science | 3 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,048,071
of 24,192,521 outputs
Outputs from BMC Chemical Engineering
#9
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,156
of 354,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Chemical Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,192,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.