↓ Skip to main content

Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a cause of mandibular osteomyelitis in a young woman: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a cause of mandibular osteomyelitis in a young woman: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13256-016-1118-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge Tellez-Rodriguez, Rubi Lopez-Fernandez, Rodolfo Rodriguez-Jurado, Hayde Nallely Moreno-Sandoval, Francisco Martinez-Perez, Juan Antonio Gonzalez-Barrios

Abstract

Tuberculosis is considered an emerging disease worldwide; in the last 10 years, its incidence has increased to more than 9.6 million cases of active tuberculosis. In 2014, it resulted in 1.5 million patient deaths. However, oral presentation with bone involvement occurs in less than 3% of all reported cases and rarely arouses clinical suspicion on initial presentation. A 15-year-old Mexican girl who had a previous diagnosis of neurofibromatosis presented to our hospital with pain and swelling in the region of the left mandibular body since November 2011. A clinical examination revealed pain in the mandibular region, a mass of soft consistency that seemed to involve bone, and a fistula with discharge of intraoral purulent material. Additionally, tachycardia and hyperthermia were observed. The left submental and submandibular regions had a 12-cm-diameter swelling, which was well-delineated and nonerythematous. The final diagnosis was established by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The final diagnosis of rare cases of tuberculous osteomyelitis in the jaw can be established by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the lesion. Simple and fast complementary diagnosis by real-time polymerase chain reaction is a fundamental approach to establishing early and effective pharmacological and surgical treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Lecturer 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 16 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 18 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,504,575
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,270
of 3,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,521
of 420,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#43
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,935 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.