You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When it comes to assessing the impact of e-cigarettes, estimates of device prevalence matter: the BIDI Stick disposable device
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12954-023-00820-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neil McKeganey, Andrea Patton, Venus Marza, Gabriel Barnard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,217,492
of 24,208,207 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#639
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,706
of 276,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,208,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.