↓ Skip to main content

Altered microRNA expression profile in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a role in the regulation of NFL mRNA levels

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Brain, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altered microRNA expression profile in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a role in the regulation of NFL mRNA levels
Published in
Molecular Brain, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-6606-6-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danae Campos-Melo, Cristian A Droppelmann, Zhongping He, Kathryn Volkening, Michael J Strong

Abstract

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive, adult onset, fatal neurodegenerative disease of motor neurons. There is emerging evidence that alterations in RNA metabolism may be critical in the pathogenesis of ALS. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that are key determinants of mRNA stability. Considering that miRNAs are increasingly being recognized as having a role in a variety of neurodegenerative diseases, we decided to characterize the miRNA expression profile in spinal cord (SC) tissue in sporadic ALS (sALS) and controls. Furthermore, we performed functional analysis to identify a group of dysregulated miRNAs that could be responsible for the selective suppression of low molecular weight neurofilament (NFL) mRNA observed in ALS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 20%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 18%
Neuroscience 20 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,122,120
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Brain
#285
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,354
of 195,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Brain
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.