↓ Skip to main content

The midgut transcriptome of Lutzomyia longipalpis: comparative analysis of cDNA libraries from sugar-fed, blood-fed, post-digested and Leishmania infantum chagasi-infected sand flies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The midgut transcriptome of Lutzomyia longipalpis: comparative analysis of cDNA libraries from sugar-fed, blood-fed, post-digested and Leishmania infantum chagasi-infected sand flies
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-9-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan C Jochim, Clarissa R Teixeira, Andre Laughinghouse, Jianbing Mu, Fabiano Oliveira, Regis B Gomes, Dia-Eldin Elnaiem, Jesus G Valenzuela

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Brazil 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Czechia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 102 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 25%
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 18%
Unspecified 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2010.
All research outputs
#8,065,009
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,799
of 10,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,988
of 163,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#28
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,925 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.