You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pan-genome analysis of the emerging foodborne pathogen Cronobacterspp. suggests a species-level bidirectional divergence driven by niche adaptation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-366 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J Grim, Michael L Kotewicz, Karen A Power, Gopal Gopinath, Augusto A Franco, Karen G Jarvis, Qiong Q Yan, Scott A Jackson, Venugopal Sathyamoorthy, Lan Hu, Franco Pagotto, Carol Iversen, Angelika Lehner, Roger Stephan, Séamus Fanning, Ben D Tall |
| Abstract |
Members of the genus Cronobacter are causes of rare but severe illness in neonates and preterm infants following the ingestion of contaminated infant formula. Seven species have been described and two of the species genomes were subsequently published. In this study, we performed comparative genomics on eight strains of Cronobacter, including six that we sequenced (representing six of the seven species) and two previously published, closed genomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,323
of 10,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,389
of 196,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#93
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,777 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.